國外學者演講Series of Speeches From Visiting Scholars

日期 Date	主題 Theme	演講摘要 Abstract
1. 8. 2016	教學與學習協作技巧及策略工作坊 Workshop: Teaching and learning collaboration skills and strategies	本次工作坊將使參與者有機會透過實作學習式的小組練習，了解並實際設計跨學科、跨文化、跨組織的協作技巧和策略。 In this workshop participants will have the opportunity to learn about and participate in small group exercises that have been designed to teach inter-disciplinary, inter-cultural, and inter-organizational collaboration skills and strategies. The small group exercises provide hands-on learning opportunities, and have been used to teach university students and faculty in both the natural and social sciences, as well as professionals, in a variety of countries, including the U.S., Finland, Czech Republic, Denmark, Sweden, Ireland and Portugal.
12. 18. 2015	協作式統整課程— 碩士論文替代方案再構思 Collaborative Capstone Projects: Re-conceptualizing the Master Thesis	Capstone projects可為學生提供獨特的學習機會、針對外部組織產生新資訊以及更有效地運用師資人才。在這次演講中將分享個人經驗：包含動機、 capstone結構、效益及課程學習。 Capstone projects can provide unique learning opportunities for students, generate new information for external organizations, and utilize faculty talents more effectively. In this talk I will share experiences, including motivations, capstone structure, benefits and lessons learned, in the design and implementation of capstone projects that came to replace master theses.
10. 6. 2015	繼往開來的知識組織	演講包括三個重點：（一）知識的詮釋、特性、演變、優劣及其創造者等；（二）社會知識學（social epistemology）；（三）社會文化對知識組織的影響。我將從自己的《七略》研究中舉例，來闡述這三個主題，然後討論這些議題對未來知識組織的理論與系統可以有的啟發。
10. 6. 2015	LIS Education Online Forum	主要聚焦於探討圖書資訊教育的發展與現況，此次線上論壇的與談人邀請到李鶴立教授，以及丹麥哥本哈根大學皇家圖書資訊學院教授Diane Sonnenwald，藉由兩位專業學者對圖書資訊學領域的長期研究與觀察，更能夠發現、了解國內外目前圖資教育的發展現況及問題，而參與論壇的對象主要為博士班學生，對於圖書資訊領域的發展核心，以及研究者應具備的能力有更為深入的探討，對博士班學生有相當大的啟發。
10. 6. 2015	3D列印科技於美國圖書館中之運用：著作權之外的事宜 3D Printing Technologies in U.S. Public Libraries: Beyond Copyright	隨著3D列印越來越普及，相關的著作權、使用方法、設計專利與商標等議題也掀起討論熱潮。若是民眾用在圖書館裡列印出的危險物品傷害了另一人，圖書館是否應該負責任？圖書館若限制民眾列印某些物品（槍支或性玩具等），是否違反了知識自由？本場次將會分享就美國法律中的一些案例與法律議題，討論圖書館的責任歸屬並提出降低法律風險的建議。 In the past, the use of photocopy, printing, scanning and related technologies in libraries and schools raised copyright issues alone. A new technology is making its way into public libraries as part of broader maker space initiatives: 3D printing. 3D replicator technology now allows a user to create (that is, “print”) three-dimensional objects of all sorts! With 3D technology, staff and patrons can now “print” entire mechanical devices or components of other devices from something as simple as a corkscrew to parts of a prosthetic body part. These technologies raise not only copyrightissues, but now include utility and design patents and trademarks, including trade dress. With the ability to print realistic replicas, such as “sharp” or other dangerous objects, questions arise whether a library would be responsible if a patron harmed another person with an object printed at the library. Issues of intellectual freedom are also present should the library desire to prevent patrons from printing certain objects (no replicated plastic firearms in a "gun free zone" or no sex toys). This session will review the basic legal issues under U.S. law, discuss the potential for library liability and offer suggestions for minimizing legal risk.
	美國對於危險內容之規範：媒體和電玩中的爭議 The Regulation of Dangerous Content in the United States: Lessons from the Media and Video Game Controversies	美國憲法對於言論自由權利的保護很強大，本場次將討論美國政府在進行立法規範有害內容媒體和電玩之情況下如何施行言論自由。首先對於言論自由的相關概念進行探討：包括受保護及未受保護的內容、公眾論壇的規範，以及圖書館或立法單位對各項意見／內容的審查，並特別針對最近限制未成年人取得有害內容之相關議題，同時會以過去的相關案例，提供比較和討論。最後討論美國最高法院對圖書館提供民眾相似內容之意見與決策。 The rights of free speech secured under the U.S. Constitution arestrong and permeate legislative design and judicial review of new laws. This presentation discusses how concepts of free speech are applied in in light of government attempts at regulating dangerous or harmful content. The review of free speech concepts includes a discussion of protected and unprotected forms of expression, the public forum doctrine and its application to libraries and constitutional levels of scrutiny or review. The history of media and content litigation including the publishing industryand regulation is reviewed as a context for examining the recent attempts to regulate a minor’s access to content deemed “harmful.” This culminates with discussion of the recent decision from the Supreme Court providing insight to libraries in providing similar content to patrons.
	著作權、數位化、合理取用於美國國內與其他地區 Copyright, Digitization and Fair Use: Access in the U.S. and Beyond	本篇研究首先檢視美國著作權法的法源。再藉此為基礎，審閱可應用在商業實體（如：Google）、公部門及第三方學習機構在數位化時的法律原則。然而在美國，不僅保護著作權持有方，使用者的權力也受到相當程度的維護。根據The Lisbon Council 2015年由Benjamin Gilbert撰寫的報告「Intellectual Property And Economic Growth Index: Measuring The Impact Of Exceptions And Limitations In Copyright On Growth Job And Property」中，美國指數高達8.13，顯示出具彈性的著作權豁免系統與「經濟上高度附加價值產出的成長率」之間有正相關的關係。著作權法第108條對圖書館與檔案管理的保護為促成這結果的原因之一。美國及國際智慧財產權組織內部的改革，也讓第108條內關於數位化限制的相關內容進行更詳盡的檢視。此外，合理使用同樣適用於商業用途，其應用於近期的爭議中有進行討論。 This presentation first reviews the sources of law and policy making in the United States in the context of copyright. This serves as background for a review of the applicable legal principles surrounding recent digitization efforts by commercial entities such as Google, Inc. and public and tertiary institutions of learning. While the rights of copyright owners are protected in the United Sates, the rights of users receive strong protection as well. According to The Lisbon Council 2015 report by BENJAMIN GILBERT, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND ECONOMIC GROWTH INDEX: MEASURING THE IMPACT OF EXCEPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS IN COPYRIGHT ON GROWTH, JOB AND PROPERTY the United States received a top index score of 8.13 indicating the positive correlations between a flexible system of copyright exceptions “higher rates of growth in value-added output throughout their economy.” One reason for this is the broad library and archive rights secured under Section 108 of the copyright law. The digitization aspects including limitations of Section 108 are reviewed in light of reform efforts in the United States and within the World Intellectual Property Organization. In addition the fair use doctrine is available even for commercial endeavors and its application is discussed in several recent controversies.